Mourning, Victorian Style

Recently I went to a DAR meeting (Yes, that is Daughters of the American Revolution, and I, with my distinctly un-blue blood, am a member). The wonderful speaker was from the Summit County Historical Society, and her presentation was on the Victorian Woman. She brought all kinds of artifacts from the Victorian era in the U.S., including clothing, underclothing, shoes, books, a calling card case, a coffee grinder, etc. At one point she described mourning customs, which were ridiculously excessive, particularly for women. The Victorians, led by mourner-in-chief, Queen Victoria, elevated mourning to an art form. Victoria’s beloved Prince Albert died in 1861, plunging her into a mourning period that lasted half a century.

Cassell’s Household Guide, published in 1869, provides tremendous detail regarding funerals and mourning customs, in five separate sections organized in no discernible manner, sandwiched between instructions for making a pincushion, foot-gear, different types of butter, a recipe for salting a herring, and a chapter entitled “Animals Kept for Pleasure and Profit–The Horse.” The guide also includes the costs of burial vaults and plots, which ranged from the exorbitant £49 7s. 6d. for a family vault at Highgate Cemetery, to 6s. 8d. for a single grave in unconsecrated, third class ground. Relatives of the deceased sent invitations to funerals, and if the family was particularly wealthy they were also expected to send “mourning coaches” to collect the invitees. Families were expected to use black-edged mourning stationery for correspondence during the entire period of mourning. Fortunately, Cassell’s had recommendations on where to purchase such things: “While on the subject of mourning stationery, we may mention that every kind of such articles as may be required, may be obtained of the best quality and at the lowest prices from Messrs. Terry, Stoneman, and Co., the wholesale, retail, and manufacturing stationers of Hatton Garden.”

When Cassell’s was written in 1869, women were not advised to attend funerals: “It sometimes happens among the poorer classes that the female relatives attend the funeral; but this custom is by no means to be recommended, since in these cases it but too frequently happens that, being unable to restrain their emotions, they interrupt and destroy the solemnity of the ceremony with their sobs, and even by fainting.”  By the 1880s, it was customary for women to attend funerals of relatives, “if disposed to do so.”

Rules for mourning apparel were complicated; an 1888 book entitled Manners and Rules of Good Society, or, Solecisms to be Avoided, has an entire chapter devoted to the subject. It includes rules for everyone from spouses (two years) to second cousins (three weeks, optional) and contemporaries. For example, it says,

The Regulation Period for a Widow’s Mourning is two years; of this period crape should be worn for one year and nine months, for the first twelve months the dress should be entirely covered with crape, for the remaining nine months it should be trimmed with crape, heavily so the first six months, and considerably less the remaining three; during the last three months black without crape should be worn. After the two years two months half-mourning is prescribed, but many people prefer to continue wearing black without crape in lieu of half- mourning. The widow’s cap should be worn for a year and a day. Lawn cuffs and collars should be worn during the crape period. After a year and nine months jet trimming may be worn. 

The rules for widowers were rather simpler. They were expected to wear black during the mourning period, but they could enter society sooner than the customary year widows were required to wait. They had to wear black wore black hat bands of different widths, depending upon the degree of the relationship–a man mourning his wife, for example, was expected to wear a hat band seven inches wide. (Fortunately, it was also the era of the tall top hat.)

Such rules seem excessive to us, but are on some level understandable, I think. Customs ventured into the truly bizarre, however, with the practices of post-mortem photography and hair jewelry. For centuries people have painted pictures of the dead, of course, but some families in the Victorian era actually posed their deceased loved ones as if they were alive–propping them up or painting eyeballs on closed lids. There’s a great article on one of my favorite sites for the strange and bizarre, io9.com, featuring several photos.

The speaker at the meeting I mentioned at the start of this absurdly long post showed several examples of hair jewelry, which was very popular both in England and America in the late 19th century. Strands of a loved one’s hair were included in a locket or a ring, and in more extreme examples, braided into elaborate designs. Google “Victorian hair jewelry” and you’ll see more of it than you ever wanted to see. You can even buy some, if you’re so inclined, on eBay.

****

I started this post a few months ago, but I didn’t finish it until a couple of days ago. It seems fitting, and maybe a bit cathartic (okay, maybe a lot), that I should post it now. On January 13, my father passed away at the age of 73. We were estranged for nearly half my life, but thankfully we made our peace in the last few years. He had a completely different life without me, spending more than 25 years in California with his wife, Barb, and her son, whom I still haven’t met. My sister, who has always been a more forgiving and attentive daughter than I, was much closer to him, and traveled to California to be with Barb after his death. Clearing out his home office, she said, gave her a more complete picture of who he was–utterly devoted to his wife, and more creative and clever than I ever gave him credit for. I’m sorry for that, sorry I didn’t know him better, and that he didn’t know me better. But a life filled with regrets wouldn’t be a tribute to either one of us, so instead I will remember the little things: he was a talented graphic artist, he tickled my feet so often when I was little that they aren’t ticklish any more (I have no idea if there’s really a connection between the two, but I like to think so), he made a bizarre but surprisingly tasty brie and pear omelette, he used to call blueberry syrup “slueberry burp,” he loved dogs and Fleetwood Mac, he taught me to whistle and to play darts, and when I look in the mirror I see his eyes looking back at me.

Here’s to you, Dad. Love you.

5 Comments:

  1. Another lovely post, Marin, and a fitting tribute to your creative father. I once did an article on wrought iron railings, and discovered that until Queen Victoria’s time, they weren’t painted black, necessarily. But after Albert’s death, Englanders painted their railings in a show of mourning, and it became the rage. Funny how things happen.

  2. Thanks, Becky. I hope he would have liked it.

    I didn’t know that about the railings–I thought they’d always been black. Interesting!

  3. Sorry Marin, catching up on old posts. Losing a loved one, however estranged, may be worse because you missed so much of each others lives. What could have been had you stayed in touch? Your message was a clear and well written tribute. My sympathies.

    We need to talk about DAR. I qualify, but never when through the process. We’ll have to talk about that.

    Barb H

  4. Thanks, Barb. 🙂 I’d be delighted to talk about DAR–I hope to see you soon!

  5. Pingback: Why So Many Dead Bodies?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Solve : *
5 × 24 =


  • Archives